An open letter
to Professor Peter White
19 November,
2007
Dear Professor White
Re: Your response to: “Whiter than White”
by Margaret Williams.
For accurate information on ME, logical analysis,
referenced statements and integrity, I have never
hesitated to recommend researcher and author,
Margaret Williams. It was therefore with interest
that I read your response to her recent comments
regarding the radio interview in which you
participated. I must say that your reaction was
entirely predictable and having read it, I
then listened to the interview in question.
You included your
email address in your response, and I took that as
an invitation to your readers to express their
opinions.
In matters of public
interest, satire and cartoons have the power to
diffuse anger and violence and from that point of
view, certain members of your profession have
cause to be grateful to the authors and artists who
have made good use of the rich material arising out
of one medical scandal after another. This relates
in particular to the psychiatric field.
While satirists and
cartoonists do not have the power to deliver
justice, they do take away dignity from those who
deserve, in some instances, no less than criminal
prosecution.
Here we are in the
year 2007 with promises of patient/doctor
partnerships and the assurance that ME is recognized
as a neurological disease; fine words, but the
arrogance and abuse of power continue.
We still hear jokes
such as: “The difference between God and a surgeon
is that God KNOWS he is not a surgeon.” And as
relevant today as it was ten years ago is the quote:
“Doctors will get off their pedestals when we get
off our knees”.
It is clear to those
who follow developments that the dangers of
iatrogenic disease, disability and death have
reached the point where medical treatment is now the
leading cause of suffering due to health issues.
Many books have been written on the subject and
patient concerns are constantly ridiculed by the
medical profession and those influenced by it, as
we see in ME. Time and again, history shows that
decades after various concerns were first aired by
the lay community, the medical profession issues a
statement: “It has been discovered that….”
The advice we have
been given and the pills we have swallowed, have
resulted in epidemics in obesity, diabetes, cardiac
disease, eating disorders and psychiatric conditions
to name but a few. If you become an in-patient in
hospital, the chances are that you will take an
unwelcome guest home with you - an untreatable
super bug.
In short, the medical
profession and psychiatry in particular, are
manufacturing their own business to the financial
advantage of themselves, the pharmaceutical industry
and hangers on. The disadvantaged are the sick, the
dying and their families.
A Google search on
psychiatric abuse reveals horrors that have no place
in a civilized society. There one sees conflicts of
interest, physical and mental abuse, negligence,
torture, malpractice, fraud and more.
You may attempt to
dismiss the entries as nonsense and the work of a
few cranks; you may say that only those easily
swayed (such as ME patients) believe them, but
think again. It is those who have never experienced
anything described therein who are naïve and who
could blame them for not wanting to believe that
such obscenities occur? On the other hand, those who
HAVE experienced “preventable medical error” or
seen it happen to family members and/or friends,
know the truth of it. Their numbers are growing and
they are becoming increasingly angry at the
knowledge that this situation has been allowed to
grow out of control. They gave the loyalty demanded
of them to a profession that has betrayed them.
When you speak of the
research needed into ME, they think of the valid
research results you have dismissed or ignored. When
they ask for treatment to relieve their pain and
other physical symptoms, you offer CBT, GET and
psychotropic drugs. When you protest that you DO
believe ME is physical, you add “As well as
psychological” in the same breath. When they ask for
the tests that have already picked up anomalies in
others, you dismiss those tests as irrelevant.
Your comment during
the interview that you believed some tests were too
hard on the patient was not convincing. When it
comes to ME, few doctors give a hoot about how hard
anything is for the patient. The truth of the
matter is, that patients want the tests and almost
without exception, your profession refuses to make
the referrals.
I quote from your
response: “Being a psychiatrist in the field of
CFS/ME, I am used to being misquoted, misunderstood,
or quoted out of context…” Others faced with a
similar situation might wonder why the controversy
revolves around ME and little else. They might ask
of themselves, “Could it be that I am wrong?”
If Joe Doe says that
black is white, he is ridiculed. If Psychiatrist X
says the same, his colleagues stand on their heads
and whistle through their toenails in their
determination to convince all that it is true. One
of their number can simply not be seen to be wrong!
How dare anyone suggest that it could be so!
Sadly, Professor
White, medical history is full of examples of
medical beliefs that defy common sense. And it is
full of examples of the same mistakes being made
over and over again.
If you truly believe
ME is a physical disease as you did (sort of) say,
why are you meddling in something that does not
concern you? Do you meddle in oncology?
Dermatology? Cardiology? I suspect that would
frowned upon, so why meddle in neurology?
Members of the
medical profession are supposed to belong to
society’s intellectual elite. Their general
behaviour belies that supposition. In fact, given
their resistance to learn from their mistakes,
doctors must surely be amongst the slowest learners
in society.
A few years ago, your
colleague, Michael Sharpe, came up with a novel way
of using patient anger to his advantage. He stated
that it had been accepted as one of the diagnosing
symptoms of ME.
That was certainly
news to me and I wondered, accepted by whom? The
WHO? Those engaged in legitimate research and/or
patient care? Of course not!
That comment had the
potential for causing more harm than had already
been done and was a sure way to crank up the anger
a notch or two! Perhaps that was the intention?
That the strategy was
self-serving cannot be denied. It also highlighted
the facts that (1) there is no relationship
whatsoever between genuine science and psychiatry,
and (2) those who espouse psychiatric opinion are
not necessarily smart.
Regrettably stupid,
too, are those who forget the lie they told
yesterday (e.g. “Those most prone to ME are
high-flying, educated, white women in managerial
positions”) and tell a new and contradictory one
today (e.g. “Those most prone to ME are the poorly
educated in the lower socio-economic bracket”.)
And here’s the irony.
It is people of this ilk who believe respect is
theirs as of right. It is also people of this ilk
who have the gall to attack the integrity and
intelligence of the sick and vulnerable. You have
already discovered for yourself that ME sufferers
no longer feel inclined to doff their caps and
genuflect at the sight of an approaching
stethoscope.
Psychiatric
therapists administer CBT - they tell people how to
think and behave - yet the number of suicides,
marriage break-ups, and criminal charges (mainly for
sexual abuse and fraud) are higher in psychiatry
than in other branches of medicine.
It hardly seems a safe place from which to draw a
role model.
I cannot think of one
good reason why an ME sufferer should take advice
from average run-of-the-mill psychiatrists or accept
anything they say as the truth. In general, the
short-comings lie, not with the patients as they
would have us believe, but with the same self
professed “experts”.
Gurli Bagnall
New Zealand
19 November, 2007
|