12th
February 2010
A formal complaint has been lodged by
Professor Malcolm Hooper with the Rt. Hon The Lord Drayson, Minister of State
with responsibility for the Medical Research Council (Science and Innovation)
about the “PACE” Clinical Trial of behavioural modification interventions for
people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).
PACE is the acronym for Pacing,
Activity, and Cognitive behavioural therapy, a randomised Evaluation,
interventions that, according to one of the Principal Investigators, are without
theoretical foundation.
The MRC’s PACE Trial seemingly
inhabits a unique and unenviable position in the history of medicine. It is
believed to be the first and only clinical trial that patients and the charities
that support them have tried to stop before a single patient could be recruited
and is the only clinical trial that the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
has ever funded.
Since 1993, the giant US permanent
health insurance company UNUMProvident has been advising the UK DWP about the
most effective ways of curtailing sickness benefit payments. The PACE Trial is
run by psychiatrists of the Wessely School, most of whom work for the medical
and permanent health insurance industry, including UNUMProvident. These
psychiatrists insist – in defiance of both the World Health Organisation and the
significant biomedical evidence about the nature of it -- that “CFS/ME” is a
behavioural disorder, into which they have subsumed ME, a classified
neurological disorder whose separate existence they deny. Their beliefs have
been repudiated in writing by the World Health Organisation.
In 1992, the Wessely School gave
directions that in cases of ME/CFS, the first duty of the doctor is to avoid
legitimisation of symptoms; in 1994, ME was described by Professor Simon Wessely
as merely “a belief”; in 1996 recommendations were made that no investigations
should be performed to confirm the diagnosis and in 1999 patients with ME/CFS
were referred to as “the undeserving sick”.
The complaint is supported by a 442
page Report which addresses areas of major concern about the PACE Trial.
These include apparent coercion and
exploitation of patients, flawed methodology, apparent lack of scientific
rigour, apparent failure to adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki, the unusual
personal financial interest of the Chief Investigator, the vested financial
interests of the Principal Investigators and others involved with the trial and
the underlying non-clinical purpose of the trial.
The psychiatrists’ unproven beliefs
and assumptions are presented as fact and trial therapists have been trained to
provide participants with misinformation; therapists have also been trained to
advise participants to ignore symptoms, a situation that may in some cases
result in death.
There are some extremely disquieting
issues surrounding the MRC PACE Trial and documents obtained under the Freedom
of Information Act allow the full story to be told for the first time.
People with ME/CFS do not seek any
special consideration; they simply wish to be treated equally to those who
suffer from other classified neurological disorders. As shown in the Report
that accompanies the complaint, the MRC PACE Trial clearly demonstrates that
people with ME/CFS are not treated equally to those with other chronic
neurological disorders.
The Report can be accessed -
click
here
CONTACT: Professor Malcolm Hooper
0191 – 528 - 5536